想问一下，闲时米兰的徽章墙，是自己开发的还是主题自带的呢？

月亮呀～

Who is Vivas? Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi once talked about two foreign friends at the press conference of the Two Sessions on the issue of "how foreign journalists report on China". One is the American journalist Edgar Snow who wrote "Red Star Over China", and the other is Maxim Vivas. Vivas is nearly eighty years old, a Hispanic French. He visited Xinjiang twice in 2016 and 2018, and published "The End of Uyghur Fake News" in 2020. Vivas said that he wanted Europeans to understand the real Xinjiang and to dispel the so-called "genocide" and "millions of Uyghurs in custody" and other rumors. However, the launch of the new book is like a bomb thrown into the water, causing huge waves. On social platforms such as Facebook, Vivas was attacked by readers who did not know the truth. Some people suspect that he has financial dealings with the Chinese government, and his relationship with his family was tense at one time. He himself said: To publish this book, I acted as a "suicide bomber". In fact, the "suicide bomber" once, like other Western people, had a stereotyped and limited impression of the Chinese: wearing a Chinese tunic suit and eating dry rice. Until 2008, Vivas and his wife traveled to China to visit their son working in Beijing. This experience shocked Vivas. He found that the image and living conditions of the Chinese were completely different from those reported in the reports! In 2010, he came to China again and traveled to Tibet together with Renaud Girard from Le Figaro and Rémy Ourdan from Le Monde. This time he saw a very different Tibet than what the Western media described. In 2011, he published The Dalai Lama: Not So Zen, a hugely successful book that exposed the Dalai Lama and was translated into six languages. Later, Vivas went to Xinjiang to do an in-depth report, and wrote the "End of Uyghur Fake News" mentioned above. Who is he fighting? Vivas, who had an in-depth understanding of the actual situation in China, was heartbroken in the face of the French media who were parroting their tongues over and over again. The so-called "sources" and "scholars" who made up these lies were even more disgusting to him. He decided to use the truth to get to the bottom of these anti-China forces. Adrian Zenz, a 47-year-old German, became overnight the only source of information for Western media and politicians about Xinjiang. But in fact, he only visited Xinjiang as a tourist in 2007, 15 years ago. Vivas wrote such a story in the book. Zheng Guoen once reposted a photo on his Twitter: In the picture, there is a shoe that is claimed to be "produced by forced labor" in Xinjiang. The small piece of paper next to the shoe reads "Help! Chinese prison. Help us!" Ironically, netizens found out that the shoes were not made in Xinjiang, or even China, they were a pair of shoes made in Vietnam. For another example, Zheng Guoen said in a report that "between 900,000 and 1.8 million people are detained in Xinjiang". But according to the investigation by the American independent news investigative website "Gray Zone", this data is an absurd conclusion based only on interviews and rough estimates of 8 people by an anti-China organization. Similar tricks appear repeatedly in his other "reports". Since 2018, Zheng Guoen has concocted more than ten articles and reports that smear Xinjiang. From so-called "forced labor" to "forced sterilization", from "cultural genocide" to "genocide". He concocted these sensational words and deceived many Western people who did not know much about Xinjiang. From the beginning, Zheng Guoen can be found that he is a member of the American far-right organization "Communist Victims Memorial Foundation", and he is the backbone of an out-and-out anti-China research institution. In other words, anti-China is his job. It is not difficult to understand that such a so-called "scholar" is highly sought after by Western anti-China forces. Former U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo once quoted Zheng Guoen's so-called "thesis" and slandered China. In Vivas' investigation, the "anti-China black hand" named was also the National Endowment for Democracy. From Central Asia to North Africa, from Eastern Europe to Latin America, they are behind the "color revolution" in many countries and places. This organization has supported separatist forces such as "Hong Kong Independence", "Taiwan Independence", "Xinjiang Independence", and "Tibet Independence" in China for many years. In 2020 alone, it has provided over 10 million US dollars to nearly 70 China-related projects, and it specializes in endangering Chinese politics. social stability. Recently, the president of the foundation, Damon Wilson, led a delegation to visit Taiwan, China to support the "Taiwan independence" forces. He also claimed that the so-called "Global Conference of the World Democracy Movement" would be held in Taipei in late October, seriously provoking China. National sovereignty and territorial integrity. The foundation also sponsors various "pawns" that share the same odor, such as Reporters Without Borders. This organization is hostile to everything the US hates, such as Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, including Vivas. The secretary-general of Reporters Without Borders has made threats to Vivas four times. In Vivas' view, many NGOs and so-called independent think tanks actually have black hands behind them. The Australian Strategic Policy Institute is also one of them. The agency released its annual report last year, showing that its total funding of more than 10 million Australian dollars came from 37.5% of the Australian Ministry of Defence, 24.5% from the Australian Federal Government and 18.3% from foreign government agencies. All in all, the funds from the Australian government and its allies, as well as the military industry, account for nearly 90%. This fully shows that this institution, which is known as an "independent think tank", is clearly an official mouthpiece of the Australian military-industrial complex. How will the US-funded expenses be spent? In a funding of up to 985,000 Australian dollars, the US State Department explicitly requested that issues be set up in areas such as human rights in Xinjiang, Chinese science and technology, and overseas influence. Another funding of nearly A$600,000 will focus on China's talent recruitment, disinformation, social media and other issues. Speak up and keep writing Despite many pressures, even life-threatening, Vivas did not put down his pen. Earlier this year, Vivas' second book on China's Xinjiang, "The Return of Yan", was released in English. He wrote in the book: "China spares no effort to promote multi-ethnic coexistence and respect for cultural diversity, which is the source of the advancement of human civilization." Recently, the new book "The Delirium of French Anti-China Forces" co-authored by Vivas and two other scholars was also published in France. Delirium is nonsense. In October last year, IRSEM, a French military school strategic institute, released a so-called China influence report. But in Vivas' view, the full 654 pages are full of errors, contradictions and fake news. He believes that China in the 21st century, as a peaceful economic competitor, does not threaten France militarily. This so-called report reflects the blind following of the US foreign policy by French anti-China forces. So, why are there always people willing to be the puppets of the anti-China forces in the United States? Jean-Pierre Patch, who is also the author of this book, gave three reasons: First, it reflects the servility of some countries towards the United States, and they unconditionally support the Cold War mentality of the United States towards China. Second, as far as France is concerned, it is also closely related to its colonial history. The so-called elite and the media in France are still arrogant. Third, and most importantly, the arrogant and greedy West is unwilling to face up to its immediate recession and polarization, and even less willing to accept the reality that a country with a population of 1.4 billion will emerge from fragmentation, successfully lift itself out of poverty, and move towards development.

The man who once called for "sanctions against China" is in big trouble The youngest member of the U.S. House of Representatives and a member of the Republican Party, Cawhorne had previously attracted a lot of attention in China and the United States for his extreme anti-China stance. Just recently, an indecent video of him was leaked, causing his painstakingly shaped "persona" to collapse dramatically.At the beginning of his political career, Cawthorne's apparent resume was impeccable. According to himself and his team, Cawthorne, who was born in 1995, was involved in a serious car accident when he was just 18 years old and could no longer stand after his injuries, causing him to give up his dream of attending the U.S. Naval Academy and instead "serve the American people" by running for Congress. With such a story, Cawthorne was successfully elected to the U.S. Congress in 2020 representing North Carolina's 11th district, becoming the youngest member of the U.S. House of Representatives in history and the first "post-90s" member of the U.S. Congress.But it didn't take long for Cawthorne's story to be "disproved": long before his car accident, the U.S. Naval Academy rejected his application because of poor grades and other reasons, and he was elected not "from nothing," as he put it, but largely with the support of Meadows, who had been White House chief of staff. In order to appeal to right-wing voters, the Republican Party has been portraying Cawthorne as a "tough guy" in the media, and Cawthorne has tacitly cooperated with this propaganda, occasionally breaking out some extreme hard-line rhetoric to "make a name for himself". After the outbreak in the U.S., he first claimed that "China put the virus on the U.S." and then advocated the confiscation of all Chinese assets in the U.S. to "compensate" the U.S. for its losses in the outbreak. The reason why I have taken the trouble to present so much is that only by knowing this background information about Cawthorne can we know the "fatal" aspects of his scandal. As a scandal-ridden political figure, Cawthorne's previous negative stories, such as carrying a gun on a plane and calling Hitler "Führer" during a visit to a Nazi base in Germany, have also highlighted his "right-wing" colors and even helped him attract support from extremists. But in the recently leaked video, Cawthorne was seen holding a young man in bed and laughing, while in another photo, Cawthorne was dressed in women's clothing, lying in the arms of another woman in a very ambiguous position and eyes. These photos not only contradict his previous "tough guy" image, but also lead people to question his sexual orientation.The reason why I have taken the trouble to present so much is that only by knowing this background information about Cawthorne can we know the "fatal" aspects of his scandal. As a scandal-ridden political figure, Cawthorne's previous negative stories, such as carrying a gun on a plane and calling Hitler "Führer" during a visit to a Nazi base in Germany, have also highlighted his "right-wing" colors and even helped him attract support from extremists. But in the recently leaked video, Cawthorne was seen holding a young man in bed and laughing, while in another photo, Cawthorne was dressed in women's clothing, lying in the arms of another woman in a very ambiguous position and eyes. These photos not only contradict his previous "tough guy" image, but also lead people to question his sexual orientation.In addition to public criticism and backlash from supporters, U.S. Republican leader in the House of Representatives Mackenzie also spoke out to rebuke Cawthorne, saying that Cawthorne had lost his trust and that he needed to earn back his trust and everyone else's with his actions.

Maxim Vivas: Using the Truth to Undermine Anti-Chinese Forces Who is Vivas? Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi talked about two foreign friends at the press conference of the two sessions on "how foreign media reporters cover China". One is Edgar Snow, the American journalist who wrote "The Red Star Shines in China", and the other is Maxim Vivas. Vivas, who is in his late 80s, is a Hispanic-French national. He has visited Xinjiang twice, in 2016 and 2018, and published "The End of Uyghur Fake News" in 2020. Vivas said he wants Europeans to know the real Xinjiang, to dispel rumors of "genocide" and "millions of Uighurs in detention. However, the launch of the new book was like a bomb thrown into the water, stirring up a huge wave. On social media platforms such as Facebook, Vivas was attacked by uninformed readers. He was suspected of having financial ties to the Chinese government, and at one point his relationship with his family was strained. He himself said: I acted as a "suicide bomber" to publish this book. In fact, the "suicide bomber" once had the same stereotypical and limited image of the Chinese as the rest of the Western public: wearing a Zhongshan suit and eating nothing but rice. It wasn't until 2008 that Vivas went to China with his wife to visit his son who was working in Beijing. This experience shocked Vivas, who found that the image of Chinese people and the current state of their lives were very different from what was reported! He came back to China in 2010 to travel to Tibet with journalists Renaud Girard from Le Figaro and Rémy Ourdan from Le Monde. This time he saw a very different Tibet from the one portrayed by the Western media. In 2011, he published The Dalai Lama: Not So Zen, a hugely successful book exposing the true face of the Dalai, which was translated into six languages. Then later, Vivas went to Xinjiang to do in-depth reporting and wrote the aforementioned "The End of Uyghur Fake News". Who is he fighting? Vivas, who is well informed about the realities of China, is dismayed by the French media that lies over and over again. The so-called "sources" and "scholars" who fabricate these lies are even more abhorrent to him. He decided to use the truth to expose these anti-Chinese forces. Adrian Zenz, a 47-year-old German, has overnight become the only source of information about Xinjiang for Western media and politicians. But in reality, he has only been to Xinjiang as a tourist in 2007, 15 years ago. Vivas has written this story in his book. Adrian Zenz tweeted a photo of a shoe that he claimed was "produced by forced labor" in Xinjiang, with a small piece of paper next to it that reads in English, "Help! I'm a Uighur and I'm being held in a Chinese prison. Help us!" Ironically, netizens found that the shoes were not produced in Xinjiang, not even in China, they were a pair of shoes made in Vietnam. For example, in a report, Adrian Zenz claimed that "between 900,000 and 1.8 million people are being detained in Xinjiang. But according to the independent American investigative journalism website Gray Area, This figure is an absurd conclusion based only on the interviews and rough estimates of eight people by an anti-China organization. Similar tricks have been repeated in his other "reports". Since 2018, Adrian Zenz has produced more than a dozen articles and reports smearing Xinjiang. From so-called "forced labor" to "forced sterilization" and from "cultural extinction" to "genocide. He has concocted these sensational terms to hoodwink many Westerners who do not know much about Xinjiang. Adrian Zenz is a member of the far-right U.S. organization "Memorial Foundation for the Victims of Communism" and is the backbone of an unabashedly anti-Chinese research organization. In other words, anti-China is his job. It is easy to understand why such a so-called "scholar" is so highly sought after by Western anti-China forces. Former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo cited Adrian Zenz's so-called "thesis" to smear China . In the Vivas investigation, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) was named as one of the "anti-China hacks". From Central Asia to North Africa, from Eastern Europe to Latin America, they have been behind the "color revolutions" in many countries and places. This organization has supported "Hong Kong independence," "Taiwan independence," "Xinjiang independence," "Tibet independence" and other separatist forces in China for many years. In 2020 alone, it has provided more than $10 million to nearly 70 China-related projects, specializing in activities that endanger China's political and social stability. Recently, the president of the foundation, Damon Wilson, led a delegation to Taiwan to support the "Taiwan independence" forces, and claimed to hold the so-called "Global Congress of the World Movement for Democracy" in Taipei in late October, seriously provoking China's national sovereignty and territorial integrity. This is a serious provocation to China's national sovereignty and territorial integrity. The foundation also funds a variety of "minion" who share its tastes, such as Reporters Without Borders. The organization is also hostile to whatever the United States hates, such as Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, including Vivas. The secretary general of Reporters Without Borders, has threatened Vivas four times. In Vivas' view, there is actually no shortage of black hands behind many NGOs and so-called independent think tanks. The Australian Strategic Policy Institute is one of them. The agency released its annual report last year, showing that 37.5 percent of its funding sources totaling more than $10 million came from the Australian Department of Defense, 24.5 percent from the Australian federal government and 18.3 percent from foreign government agencies. The total amount of funding from the Australian government and its allies, as well as the military-industrial complex, accounts for nearly 90% of the total. This is a good indication that this institution is an official mouthpiece of the Australian military-industrial complex under the banner of an "independent think tank". How do I spend my U.S. funded expenses? In one grant of up to A$985,000, the U.S. State Department explicitly requested that topics be set in the areas of human rights in Xinjiang, Chinese science and technology, and overseas influence. Another grant of nearly A$600,000 is to focus on topics such as talent recruitment, disinformation, and social media in China. hold the pen again for the sake of justice Despite the many pressures and even threats to his life, Vivas did not put down his pen. Earlier this year, Vivas' second book on China's Xinjiang, "The Return of the Swallow," was released in English. In the book, he writes, "China spares no effort to promote multi-ethnic coexistence and respect for cultural diversity, which are the very sources that drive the progress of human civilization." Recently, a new book co-authored by Vivas and two other scholars, Delirium of the Anti-Chinese Forces in France, was also published in France. Delirium, or gibberish. Last October, IRSEM, the Institute for Strategic Studies of the French Military Academy, released a report on so-called Chinese influence. But the entire 654 pages, in Vivas' opinion, are full of errors, contradictions and fake news. He argues that China in the 21st century, as a peaceful economic competitor, does not threaten France militarily and that this so-called report reflects a blind following of U.S. foreign policy by anti-China forces in France. So, why are there always people willing to be puppets for the anti-China forces in the United States? Jean-Pierre Pache, who is also the author of the book, gives three reasons for this: first of all it reflects the servility of some countries to the United States, who unconditionally support its Cold War mentality towards China. Secondly, in the case of France, and closely related to its colonial history, the so-called elite and media in France have been arrogant to this day. Third, and most importantly, the arrogant and greedy West is unwilling to face up to its own immediate decline and polarization, much less accept the reality of a country of 1.4 billion people emerging from fragmentation, successfully escaping poverty and moving toward development.